最新文章专题视频专题问答1问答10问答100问答1000问答2000关键字专题1关键字专题50关键字专题500关键字专题1500TAG最新视频文章推荐1 推荐3 推荐5 推荐7 推荐9 推荐11 推荐13 推荐15 推荐17 推荐19 推荐21 推荐23 推荐25 推荐27 推荐29 推荐31 推荐33 推荐35 推荐37视频文章20视频文章30视频文章40视频文章50视频文章60 视频文章70视频文章80视频文章90视频文章100视频文章120视频文章140 视频2关键字专题关键字专题tag2tag3文章专题文章专题2文章索引1文章索引2文章索引3文章索引4文章索引5123456789101112131415文章专题3
问答文章1 问答文章501 问答文章1001 问答文章1501 问答文章2001 问答文章2501 问答文章3001 问答文章3501 问答文章4001 问答文章4501 问答文章5001 问答文章5501 问答文章6001 问答文章6501 问答文章7001 问答文章7501 问答文章8001 问答文章8501 问答文章9001 问答文章9501
当前位置: 首页 - 科技 - 知识百科 - 正文

Fine-TuningMySQLFull-TextSearchwithInnoDB_MySQL

来源:懂视网 责编:小采 时间:2020-11-09 20:04:09
文档

Fine-TuningMySQLFull-TextSearchwithInnoDB_MySQL

Fine-TuningMySQLFull-TextSearchwithInnoDB_MySQL:If you are using FULLTEXT indexes in MySQL and plan to switch from MyISAM to InnoDB then you should review the reference manual section onFine-Tuning MySQL Full-Text Searchto see what configuration changes may be required. As I mentioned in
推荐度:
导读Fine-TuningMySQLFull-TextSearchwithInnoDB_MySQL:If you are using FULLTEXT indexes in MySQL and plan to switch from MyISAM to InnoDB then you should review the reference manual section onFine-Tuning MySQL Full-Text Searchto see what configuration changes may be required. As I mentioned in

If you are using FULLTEXT indexes in MySQL and plan to switch from MyISAM to InnoDB then you should review the reference manual section onFine-Tuning MySQL Full-Text Searchto see what configuration changes may be required. As I mentioned inyesterday’s postwhen comparing query results on my database with FULLTEXT indexes in MyISAM versus InnoDB I got different results. Specifically, the InnoDB tables were returning fewer results for certain queries with short FULLTEXT search terms. Here’s an example of a query that returned fewer results on InnoDB:

select idfrom flite.ad_indexwhere match(name,description,keywords) against('+v1*' IN BOOLEAN MODE);

The issue was that all of the fine tuning I had done before was limited to MyISAM, so it didn’t affect InnoDB. In the past I configured MySQL FULLTEXT search to index words as short as 1 character (the default is 3), and to index common words (not to use any stopword list). These are the relevant variables I set in in my.cnf:

ft_min_word_len = 1ft_stopword_file = ''

InnoDB has its own variables to control stopwords and minimum word length, so I needed to set these variables when I changed the tables from MyISAM to InnoDB:

innodb_ft_min_token_size = 1innodb_ft_enable_stopword = OFF

Since those variables are not dynamic, I had to restart MySQL for them to take effect. Furthermore, I needed to rebuild the FULLTEXT indexes on the relevant tables. This is howthe manualinstructs you to rebuld the indexes:

To rebuild the FULLTEXT indexes for an InnoDB table, use ALTER TABLE with the DROP INDEX and ADD INDEX options to drop and re-create each index.

Rather than drop and recreate the indexes, I just usedALTER TABLE ... FORCEto rebuild the table (and indexes), like this:

alter table flite.ad_index force;

After making those changes I re-ranpt-upgrade, and now I am getting the same set of rows back from MyISAM and InnoDB. The order of the rows is slightly different in some cases, but as I mentioned yesterday that isexpected behavior.

声明:本网页内容旨在传播知识,若有侵权等问题请及时与本网联系,我们将在第一时间删除处理。TEL:177 7030 7066 E-MAIL:11247931@qq.com

文档

Fine-TuningMySQLFull-TextSearchwithInnoDB_MySQL

Fine-TuningMySQLFull-TextSearchwithInnoDB_MySQL:If you are using FULLTEXT indexes in MySQL and plan to switch from MyISAM to InnoDB then you should review the reference manual section onFine-Tuning MySQL Full-Text Searchto see what configuration changes may be required. As I mentioned in
推荐度:
标签: my mysql fu
  • 热门焦点

最新推荐

猜你喜欢

热门推荐

专题
Top